A storm of controversy has erupted after former White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki took aim at Vice President JD Vance

and his wife, Usha, during a recent podcast appearance. Speaking on the “I’ve Had It” show, Psaki described

Vance as a “little Manchurian candidate” and mocked his personality, calling him “a chameleon with no rizz.”

But what truly set social media ablaze was her personal jab at Vance’s wife: “Blink four times. Come over here,

we’ll save you.” The remark quickly spread online, sparking accusations of mockery and poor taste — even from Psaki’s usual supporters.

Vice President Vance responded calmly but firmly, labeling Psaki’s comments “disgraceful” while publicly praising

his wife as his “wonderful partner and best friend.” The clip, which has since gone viral, triggered outrage

from both political camps. Some criticized Psaki for crossing personal boundaries, while others claimed the

controversy highlighted a double standard in political media — where mocking conservative figures often draws less condemnation.

White House Communications Director Steven Cheung joined the backlash, calling Psaki “talentless” and accusing

her of “trying to stay relevant by attacking others.” Online commentators echoed that sentiment, arguing that

her comments revealed growing frustration among Democratic media figures amid recent political challenges.

Several users also pointed out that Psaki’s successor, Karine Jean-Pierre, has faced similar criticism for

her handling of President Biden’s public image, especially following televised moments that raised concerns about his mental acuity.

While Psaki has not apologized or clarified her remarks, the episode has reignited debates about the tone of

modern political discourse. Critics argue that humor at the expense of families only deepens the nation’s

political divide, while supporters claim Psaki’s comments were meant as satire. Either way, the uproar

surrounding her remarks shows just how quickly a few sentences can spark national headlines — and how personal attacks continue to overshadow policy in today’s political battles.